Not necessary to start insolvency against principal borrower first: NCLAT

-

Not necessary to start insolvency against principal borrower first: NCLAT



A financial creditor can seek to first initiate insolvency proceedings against a corporate guarantor of a company, instead of the company itself, in case the guarantee fails, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held.

The corporate insolvency resolution process, thus, can go ahead against the guarantor under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), even without having proceeded with and exhausted all legal remedies against the principal debtor, it has said.
The appellate tribunal reasoned that any corporate guarantee given by a parent company for a subsidiary becomes debt as soon it is invoked; subsequently, the corporate guarantor becomes a debtor under the terms of the IBC.

“Guarantee of such nature is included within the definition of financial debt. There is, therefore, no reason why a financial creditor cannot invoke Section 7 against the corporate guarantors, once the guarantee is invoked. The judgment is within the contours of the Code and does not particularly add any additional nuances, except that it might be the first of its kind,” said Saurav Kumar, partner at legal firm IndusLaw.
Section 7 deals with initiation of the corporate insolvency resolution process by a financial creditor.
The appellate tribunal’s judgment came on an insolvency plea of Rural Electrification Corporation (REC) against Ferro Alloys Corporation. The latter was corporate guarantor for its subsidiary, FACOR Power. FACOR had borrowed Rs 511 crore from REC, the corporate guarantee for which was provided by Ferro Alloys Corporation.
After FACOR failed on repayment and became a non-performing asset (NPA), REC decided to invoke the corporate guarantee provided by Ferro Alloys and asked the latter to pay the Rs 564 crore of total dues within 21 days of September 30, 2015. Ferro Alloys did not and REC approached the National Company Law Tribunal bench at Kolkata.
It also held that the corporate guarantee provided was joint and co-extensive with that of the principal debtor.

Regards,
CA Pankit A. Shah
Chartered Accountant

Office Address :- 
35, 4th Floor, Shree Krishna Center, 
Near Mithakhali Six road,
Navrangpura, Ahmedabad-380009.
Office Phone :- 079-4898 5464
Mobile No. :- 92272 30943

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Food Safety Compliance System (FoSCoS, URL - https://foscos.fssai.gov.in) wef 01st June 2020 in the States/UTs of Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Odisha, Delhi, Manipur, Puducherry, Goa, Chandigarh and Ladakh.

-
Image
Food Safety Compliance System (FoSCoS) is an enhanced version of Food Licensing and Registration System (FLRS) which was launched in 2012 for issuance of pan-India FSSAI Licenses and Registration.      It had evolved incrementally and organically with changing regulatory needs. The technology on which it was built was outdated with technical support no longer available. Over years users complained of slow speed of FLRS and software experts resisted new changes on FLRS thus impeding any further improvement, expansion and innovation in the licensing system. Thus the migration from FLRS to FoSCoS was imperative. FoSCoS is built using latest technology with a vision to have modern on stop pan-India IT platform for food safety
Read more

Food Safety and Standards (Organic Foods) Regulations, 2017 is coming in to force from 1st April, 2019,

-
Image
  The FSSAI has issued a direction advising the enforcement official that these regulations may be considered as ‘ Enabling Regulations ’ and not to be considered for prosecution particularly for small original producers and producer organizations during initial phase of its implementation.  As per the FSS (Organic Foods) Regulations, any food offered for sale as ‘organic food’ should comply with the provisions laid down under either the National Programme for Organic Production (NPOP) administered by the Ministry of Commerce or the Participatory Guarantee System for India   (PGS-India) operated by the ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare or any other system or standards that may be notified by the Food Authority from time to time.  Meanwhile, various representations have been received regarding challenges faced by organic food business operators including small original producers in light of the fact that a large number of producers and producer organizations in
Read more

Processed milk samples fail to meet quality norm

-
Image
To check this, the regulator has directed the organised dairy sector to strictly complying with the quality norms and put in place 'testing and inspection' at entire value chain by January 1, 2020     Processed milk, including of major brands, have failed to meet the prescribed quality norm in 37.7 per cent of the total samples tested, according to an FSSAI study. In safety parameters too, 10.4 per cent of the processed milk samples were non-compliant, much higher than 4.8 per cent in raw milk. Adulteration was found in only 12 of the total samples surveyed with maximum reported in Telangana, followed by Madhya Pradesh and Kerala, the study said. The FSSAI study collected a total 6,432 milk samples from 1,103 towns and cities between May and October 2018 in all states and union territories. About 40.5 per cent of the total sample was processed milk, while the rest was raw milk. To check this, the regulator has directed the organised dairy sector to strictly start co
Read more